kaspersky databases are extremely out of date

confidential information, I doubt the effort you are putting into your thoughts for high level security should be of that much concern. Unless you are planing to get security for a big intranet setup for your routers and networks to save access to some govt. It is a good product if you want to use it.

sect using Trend Micro for protection while I was working there. I have seen most of the multinational corp and govt. Though most of the crack or patch never get false positives by Norton from what I have experienced yet you tell that by never using any of their recent products. What I like to do is that I add a particular folder like my download folder or the folder where I am using a crack file to the exclusion rule be it any security suite that I use. As a matter of fact as time passed after the installation of Kaspersky, it started to take a toll on my ram usage but Norton remained constant with it's good performance so eat your own words and do some research on your own before you jump on the band wagon of these marketing gimmicks fanboy.Īs far as the comment goes that Norton detects suspicious files and erase threats, isn't erasing threats the job of an antivirus? But if I ever came across an issue where the file was quarantined, norton always provided with a restore option, so I don't see any harm done. And just for the record I have used both Norton and Kaspersky and this whole high resource utilization thing about Norton is an utter nonsense since I have hardly noticed any difference with the performance from start up to the running of multiple process smoothly. Even then, reality is Norton is just as good if not any superior to Kaspersky and quite honestly I would blindly trust Norton Security, McAfee, Trend Micro, F-Secure kind of more established organisation over some 3rd party so called internet security suit bullshit like Kaspersky, Avast, Eset or BitDefender garbage etc. Know that you will most likely never even encounter most of these so-called threats, reality is that a computer can do just fine without any antivirus installed in the system unless you are some sleazy pervert who likes to surf a lot of adult streaming websites or risky websites to download cracks, patches, sql injections for hacking and what not. All these high percentage malware and virus detection rate is a marketing gimmick to sell the software. Unless I am some sort of kaspersky fanboy I will never be too inclined to the idea of using Kaspersky over Norton.

Kaspersky databases are extremely out of date